In turbulent waters, trust is democracy’s anchor
Lindsay de Sausmarez
- Published
- Opinion & Analysis

The bonds that underpin democracy are weakening under the strain of populism, polarisation and mistrust. Here, Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez, Guernsey’s Chief Minister, argues that rebuilding trust and cooperation is now the defining challenge for political leadership
On a recent crossing of the Channel to visit the nuclear facilities on the Normandy coast, I could not help but reflect on the metaphors around me. The sea was unsettled, a storm gathered on the horizon, yet occasional shafts of brilliant sunlight broke through the cloud.
It looked and felt like an image of politics today, with brief moments of hope among waves of uncertainty.
The global outlook has tested even the most steadfast optimists, myself among them. Environmental tipping points edge closer, carrying the risk of irreversible damage. Technological advances promise extraordinary breakthroughs, yet their pace outruns the safeguards needed to keep them safe. Economic uncertainty deepens, while geopolitical tensions harden into hybrid warfare and, all too often, into open and brutal conflict.
What troubles me most is the slow weakening of the bonds that hold communities together — the steady unravelling of our social fabric that has long underpinned trust in our institutions.
I was reminded of this when listening to a sociologist explain why humankind had flourished where other species had not. Our advantage was never intelligence alone, she explained, but the ability to communicate and cooperate with one another. It is ironic that the very gift which enabled our evolutionary success — our capacity for communication — has produced tools like social media that now corrode it.
Social media connects us in unprecedented ways, many of which can be positive, yet the algorithms that drive it thrive on outrage and sensationalism. The result is sharper political rhetoric, deepening polarisation and a fertile breeding ground for populism and autocracy.
Populists, adept at pressing the right buttons to capture attention, are gaining ground at both extremes of the political spectrum, leaving the centre more fractured and fragile. Democracies weakened by such internal strife are easy prey for those who would see them diminished, which is not only a godsend to autocratic regimes but, as we are beginning to understand, an intentional strategy.
But if anyone can defend against this kind of deterioration, it’s small, close-knit communities like ours in Guernsey. Island life gives us a stronger sense of identity and belonging and, while far from perfect, we remain a relatively trusting society – one still grounded in real-world conversations and interactions.
People often apologise when they stop me in the street or the supermarket to ask about government, but I never see it as an imposition. In fact, I believe it is our collective superpower. The ease with which people can speak directly to their representatives strengthens the bond between community and government, and that accessibility serves as a safeguard against the kind of dehumanising tribalism and polarisation that has become so depressingly common elsewhere.
Ultimately, we all face a choice. We can embrace the kind of aggressive political rhetoric where confrontational disagreement dominates, or we can adopt a more collaborative approach. In its recent election, Guernsey appears to have chosen the latter. After several fractious years when the political atmosphere was often deeply unpleasant, voters supported many candidates committed to building consensus. It is still early days, and the challenges remain immense, but I am hopeful this change in tone can be sustained so that less energy is wasted on division and more invested in delivery.
Guernsey is small, with a population no greater than a large town in the United Kingdom, yet we are also a self-governing jurisdiction carrying the full responsibilities of government and economic management. Our size cannot be an excuse for passivity.
Representing Guernsey at a recent UK party conference brought this home to me. As a sustainable finance centre, we channel capital into infrastructure and the global energy transition. We are home to international healthcare businesses. We offer practical examples of policies that work and can be adapted elsewhere. Increasingly, we act in partnership with Jersey as Channel Islanders, which is how many outside our Bailiwicks already perceive us. Together we maintain a shared Brussels office to represent our interests in the EU and a joint bureau in Caen focused on regional matters. We work closely too with our fellow Crown Dependency, the Isle of Man. Cooperation is both our tradition and our strategy, and it serves us well.
The seas ahead for politics will likely remain unsettled, but our ability to navigate them still rests on the same quality that has always defined us as human beings: the capacity to communicate, to cooperate, and to hold fast to trust. If we can sustain that, then even in stormy waters like these there will always be light on the horizon.
Further information
Produced in partnership with Guernsey’s government. To find out more, visit www.gov.gg
Read More: ‘Move to Guernsey: The Channel’s island gem‘. With rising taxes and economic uncertainty in the UK, more individuals and businesses are exploring relocation options. While offshore hubs like Dubai might dominate the conversation, more people than ever are looking closer to home—to the Channel Islands. Guernsey, in particular, offers financial stability, an excellent quality of life, and easy access to the UK
Do you have news to share or expertise to contribute? The European welcomes insights from business leaders and sector specialists. Get in touch with our editorial team to find out more.
Main Image: Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez
RECENT ARTICLES
-
Is Europe sleepwalking into identity-linked internet access? -
Britain cannot claim to be united while disabled people still feel invisible -
Visit Rwanda: How football is helping to tell of a remarkable journey from genocide towards prosperity -
Should the Church be beyond political scrutiny? -
Why the future of feminism may no longer belong to the West -
What history can teach Trump about the Strait of Hormuz crisis -
Should we be feeding our pets raw meaty bones? -
Why Sweden is returning to printed books in the classroom -
Cyprus stakes its claim in Europe’s defence surge -
Password hell is ending – but the new login future has a terrifying catch -
Who gets to belong in British politics? -
This is AI’s greatest flaw -
Liechtenstein’s stability becomes a strategic advantage in fragmented Europe -
An attack on Jewish Britons is an attack on us all -
Forget the workplace — the real AI revolution will change human relationships -
Diving into… the history of swimming -
Exclusive: Nato ‘too slow to deter Putin’, warns former RAF commander -
Disabled drivers ‘pushed out of the driving seat’ by Motability Scheme shake-up -
Thailand’s Land Bridge: The world’s next great trade route -
Lasercom has solved one problem. The next is getting the data back to Earth -
For disabled people, the countryside remains as accessible as the crown jewels -
The AI lover who received a funeral speaks volumes about modern intimacy -
UK Biobank and the great British data gamble -
The legal case against Britain’s new data regime -
Equality has a cost — and men will have to pay it



























