Half of counteroffers successful as hiring crisis continues
John E. Kaye

- Three in 10 (31%) of those searching for a new role would consider a counteroffer from their current employer
- More than half (53%) of those who have received a counteroffer in the past accepted
- However, a third (34%) who accepted had moved on from their organisation within six months, suggesting counteroffers are only a short-term fix
With close to 1.3 million job vacancies across the UK, and 9.4 million employees looking to make a career move before July, new research reveals that employers worried about retention may be able to buy time with a counteroffer.
According to the latest study from talent solutions consultancy Robert Half, 31 per cent of those currently looking for a new role would consider a counteroffer from their current employer – but they are serious about leaving if the offer is not right.
While movement in the job market is above and beyond pre-pandemic levels, not everyone currently applying for and interviewing for roles is serious about making a move. Nearly one in five (19%) of those looking for a new role are hoping that their employer will make them a counteroffer.
More than two in five people (42%) who are currently searching for a new role would like a pay rise, while 19 per cent would like a promotion, so it is no surprise that in an active job market where demand is outpacing supply that one in five (18%) have seen an opportunity to use a job offer as a bargaining chip – and it works.
Counteroffers are commonplace (although not guaranteed), with 57 per cent having received one at some point in their career – but it does appear to be a more effective strategy for men than women. While slightly more women than men are willing to consider a counteroffer, they are less likely to receive one. Three in five (61%) of men have received a counteroffer in their lifetime, in comparison to only half of women (52%).
For employers, making a counteroffer is an effective retention strategy, as more than half (53%) of those who received one the last time they were offered a new role elsewhere accepted it. However, it will not encourage employees to remain with an organisation long-term, without other actions on the part of the employer.
One third (34%) of those who accepted a counteroffer from an employer had left the organisation within six months, and three-quarters (74%) had left within a year. Employees aged under 35 will move on more quickly, with nearly half (47%) leaving within six months of accepting a counteroffer.
Matt Weston, Senior District Director for the UK, Ireland, UAE and BeNeLux, said: “Counteroffers are often only a temporary fix, and business leaders should prepare for their employees to leave within six months regardless. However, it can help employers to buy time and plan for how they may plug the gap further down the road, especially given the level of demand in the market, which makes the hiring process longer and more expensive.
“To prevent employees from seeking new roles in the first place, or to encourage them to stay after they accept a counteroffer, employers need to focus on their retention strategies. While salaries, benefits and flexible working are important parts of the puzzle, understanding employees’ mindsets is crucial. Appealing to their motivations or addressing their concerns is one thing that can really make a difference.”
Previous research from Robert Half revealed that salary was still the most important consideration for jobseekers, followed by flexible working, commute time and values, suggesting that employers should focus on these areas to retain their best talent.
TOP STORIES
-
World’s biggest golf tour lands global eSIM deal with Yesim -
Facebook owner Meta signs Texas solar deal with Turkish renewables firm -
UK universities take top four places in European global rankings -
Hurghada gets new 442-room Red Sea resort as Britons chase year-round sun -
Home routers named ‘Europe’s forgotten internet security risk’ -
New documentary explores water safety as Europe confronts soaring drowning deaths -
Venice tourists say £43 day-trip fee will turn city into ‘playground for the rich’ -
King Charles to reveal personal tax bill for first time -
AI lab says brain-like engine could slash chatbot bills by 98 per cent -
Explorer who pulled out of Titan sub dive says damning report proves disaster was inevitable -
Britain to rank among Europe’s hottest places as 40C heatwave closes in -
Sir Keir Starmer says he will become a family man after quitting as UK PM -
EasyJet rejects reported £4.7bn takeover approach from U.S investment firm -
Street-by-street maps to reveal where England’s poorest communities face worst environmental risks -
Stanley Johnson: the Government must ‘follow Ukraine back into Europe’s green network’ -
Ukraine joins European environment network in major conservation step after war damage to land and wildlife -
Titan firm never proved doomed hull was safe, damning report finds -
Europe’s €4bn Frankfurt terminal named among world’s most beautiful airports -
The fist-bumping, selfie-taking humanoid guide that could usher sightseeing tours into the AI age -
EU says ‘time for change’ on child social media safety after survey links platforms to youth distress -
China offers UK coastal rescue lessons as Yancheng wetlands hailed by conservation figures -
UK’s under-16s social media ban risks giving parents false comfort, experts warn -
What Elon Musk’s US$1,100,000,000,000 fortune could buy -
NYC woman who held funeral for ChatGPT 'lover' calls for safeguards over AI companionship -
‘Sleeper-cell’ hackers are stealing company data now for future attacks, warns ISF chief



























