Unclear AI rules risk driving talent away from UK employers, survey suggests
John E. Kaye
- Published
- News, Technology

More than half of desk-based workers say they do not have clear, enabling guidance on how to use AI at work, with many saying an employer’s approach to the technology would influence whether they take a job
A lack of clear workplace rules on artificial intelligence could be costing UK businesses talent, according to new research that suggests many employees are either working in a policy vacuum or turning to unapproved tools without oversight.
A survey by software firm Red Eagle Tech found that just over half (54.5 per cent) of full-time UK desk workers do not have a clear, enabling policy from their employer on how to use AI tools at work.
Within that group, 41 per cent said AI had either never been mentioned by their employer or was governed only through informal conversations rather than written policy.
The findings point to a workplace issue extending beyond technology adoption alone. According to the survey, more than a third (66.5 per cent) of respondents said a prospective employer’s approach to AI tools would influence whether they accepted a job offer.
More than a quarter (25.5 per cent), said it would be a major factor, with some actively favouring employers that provide approved tools and avoiding those that restrict them.
The survey also suggests that uncertainty is driving the use of “shadow AI”, with employees using consumer AI tools for work without their employer’s knowledge or approval. Almost a third of respondents (32 per cent), said they had used such tools for work tasks without their employer’s knowledge.
Red Eagle Tech said that number changed little even where employers had imposed outright bans. Among workers whose employers had issued a strict ban, 33.3 per cent still said they used consumer AI tools for work tasks.
Even where employers had a clear, enabling AI policy in place, exactly a third (33 per cent) said they still resorted to unapproved consumer tools, the survey of 200 full-time workers found.
The company argues that silence from employers is producing a split workforce. Some staff use unapproved tools to save time, while others avoid AI altogether because no formal permission has been given.
The result, it says, is that compliant employees can lose out on productivity gains while risk-takers continue without oversight.
Employers should publish clear AI policies, ask staff where they believe AI could improve work, and invest in tools that integrate with existing systems, according to the company.
Kat Korson of Red Eagle Tech, said: “The great irony here is that doing nothing isn’t playing it safe. When you leave a policy vacuum, your risk-takers just use AI behind your back anyway, while your most careful, quality-conscious team members miss out on hours of productivity gains.
“On top of that, your best talent is actively looking for employers who have this sorted. It’s time to give them the right tools and clear permission.”
READ MORE: ‘AI boom leaves many workers without the data skills employers now need‘. AI may be spreading rapidly through offices, but many employees still lack the data skills needed to question outputs, interpret results and use the technology properly, according to new industry research.
Do you have news to share or expertise to contribute? The European welcomes insights from business leaders and sector specialists. Get in touch with our editorial team to find out more.
Main image: CadoMaestro/Pexels
TOP STORIES
-
Specs appeal: Welsh Parliament bans smart glasses -
European motoring legends behind Mercedes, BMW and McLaren to enter Hall of Fame -
Putin 'plotting to break NATO without firing a shot', Latvian military analyst warns -
British AI chip startup hits £5bn valuation as government backs bid to challenge global tech giants -
World's biggest military airshow moves to ‘Britain’s Area 51’ after Iran war disruption at RAF Fairford -
Lisa Nandy threatens crackdown on entertainment industry after David Walliams allegations -
UK and European experts demand tougher AI laws as Australia considers criminal penalties after OpenAI breach -
BBC loses bid to throw out Trump's $10bn defamation lawsuit over doctored Panorama speech -
AI-generated CVs spark hiring crisis as a third of employers lose confidence in job applicants -
MPs back calls for ‘Black English’ and ‘Asian English’ options on census -
Nvidia hires top US lawyer to investigate CEO's alleged affair with Chinese spy -
EXCLUSIVE – Comic Relief confirms David Walliams is no longer an honorary trustee and has ‘no formal association’ with charity -
Why Airbnb and Uber take off in some cities but flop in others, according to scientists -
Michael Jackson's Thriller jacket, Princess Diana's dresses and $3m Banksy painting go under the hammer -
European entrepreneurs trust AI firms more than governments as four-in-10 look beyond Europe -
Krakow massacre gunman named after hospital death as police officer fights for life -
British Airways owner warns green fuel rules could ‘kill European aviation’ -
EU to join Ukraine–Russia peace talks as von der Leyen warns of escalating Black Sea attacks -
Scientists grow world's largest diamond crystal in breakthrough that could stop AI chips overheating -
China takes on Rolls-Royce with floating £230,000 electric limousine -
Infront hires Deutsche Börse data expert Jeff Caldwell as AI transforms financial markets -
US rocket firm plans Scottish launches in bid to revive failed Highland spaceport -
Job adverts must reveal salaries under new ‘say what you pay’ law -
Ireland's most wanted jobs for 2027 revealed as employers offer higher salaries to attract talent -
American firms sign landmark deal to beam solar power from space as Europe faces AI energy crunch




























