Why modern computer games aren’t a patch on the classics
Aleksey Savchenko
- Published
- Opinion & Analysis, Technology

Veteran game designers are leaving the sector in droves for more job security in the government and military sectors, writes seasoned developer Aleksey Savchenko. Is this game over for the golden-age British originals like Tomb Raider?
Classic British video games such as Tomb Raider, Lemmings, Elite, GoldenEye 007, and Worms once set the gold standard for quality. They arrived polished, innovative, fully formed, and ready to play.
Compare that to today, where gamers constantly complain about the latest must-have triple-A titles being riddled with glitches and bugs. In many cases, they’re released in an unfinished state – sometimes so broken they’re virtually unplayable.
This hasn’t gone unnoticed. A recent YouGov survey found that nearly a third of British gamers believe game quality has declined in recent years. That decline is being driven by a cost-cutting frenzy sweeping the industry – one that is forcing out veteran developers and replacing them with undertrained and cheaper staff, combined with misguided attempts to automate critical production segments and indiscriminate workforce reductions that overload the remaining personnel.
For over a decade, the games industry enjoyed unchecked growth, fuelled by technological breakthroughs, mass-market appeal, and the success of live-service monetisation. By 2023, it was valued at $366 billion (£289 billion), boosted further by the Covid-era spike in gaming. The boom attracted a wave of investment, rapid scaling, and franchise-focused output.
But this growth came at a cost. Many studios scaled aggressively, hiring fast and spending heavily during a time of unprecedented expansion. As player spending slowed and investor expectations tightened, studios responded with cuts that disproportionately affected development teams. And while layoffs made headlines, many experienced developers left of their own accord – tired of short-sighted leadership, internal politics, and the pressure to create something profitable rather than meaningful.
What we’re seeing isn’t just a wave of departures, but a dismantling of the foundations that once made British game development world-class. The studios that led the industry are now hollowed out by short-term thinking and a reluctance to take creative risks.
Without veterans, studios aren’t just losing talent – they’re losing memory. Knowledge transfer, mentoring, and production discipline are vanishing. You can’t build innovative, lasting games when you’re constantly replacing experience with inexperience.
The development culture has become increasingly disconnected from the craft of making games. Executives with little to no design background now shape production around metrics, monetisation, and fast delivery. Instead of designing tomorrow’s classics, we’re ticking boxes to meet short-term targets. The result is a glut of buggy, repetitive, uninspired games that often feel unfinished on release and forgettable soon after.
Many of the veterans who have left the games industry haven’t struggled to find work. Their expertise in systems design, engineering, and production is in demand across defence, government, and immersive technology sectors. From simulation systems and national security platforms to crisis training and VR/AR environments, their skills are now powering critical infrastructure. Their work still matters – it always did – it’s just being used in industries that value it.
Systems designers and technical artists, for instance, are contributing to advanced simulation software used in military training, where their ability to model complex environments and realistic behaviours is invaluable. Others are helping to build immersive virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) platforms for mission rehearsal, tactical planning, or crisis response. They don’t make the same money as before, but they do have respect and the peace of mind that comes with job stability.
Outside of these sectors, those with strong production skills often move into small and mid-sized companies, helping to introduce efficiency where it’s needed most, while some return to making games as independent developers, free from industry bureaucracy and an ever-dangling axe over their heads.
With the culling and exodus of veterans, studios have turned to cheaper, fresh-out-of-the-gate university graduates. While the industry has behaved disgracefully in its treatment of seasoned professionals, for gamers it wouldn’t be a problem if those graduates adequately filled the gap.
But they don’t.
University game design degrees often fail to provide students with the practical skills needed to succeed in real-world development environments. Courses tend to prioritise theoretical knowledge while neglecting the realities of production pipelines, collaboration, or debugging workflows. New hires, while often passionate and creative, require significant training that few studios have time or structure to deliver. They are being set up to fail – expected to carry major projects without proper support.
This constant churn places additional strain on overworked staff and contributes to delays, inefficiencies, and ultimately higher costs. With so few experienced developers left to guide and mentor, there’s no one to train the next wave of talent – a cycle that repeats with increasingly damaging results.
Meanwhile, technical bloat continues to drag down development. Complex engines, sprawling toolsets, and fragmented workflows slow production to a crawl. Studios are pressured to ship early to keep publishers happy, regardless of whether the product is ready. That pressure results in rushed, unstable releases and burdens teams with post-launch patching instead of refining gameplay during development.
Technical debt piles up, tools get more complex, deadlines get tighter – and the people meant to hold it all together are either burnt out or gone. You can feel it in the games: the absence of joy, the lack of polish, and most of all, the unwillingness to take creative risks.
It’s not just about broken games – it’s about broken systems. Publishing producers often lack design experience, yet drive trend-based decisions without understanding production realities. Nepotism and mismanagement further destabilise teams.
Still, junior developers cost less upfront. Even if their inexperience leads to greater losses over time, the short-term savings keep studios hooked on the cycle.
In the long term, it’s the studios that lose. Without skilled developers, game companies have nothing. But without game companies, developers adapt. Many transition to new sectors or forge their own paths, developing indie titles, books, board games, comics, or immersive storytelling experiences.
So, while the veterans often land on their feet, gamers and game quality suffer. Cost-cutting leads to talent loss, and talent loss leads to broken games.
How do we fix this? It starts with studios valuing people over margins. That means investing in experienced talent, yes – but also building a production culture that encourages mentorship and knowledge transfer. Creative cultures aren’t spreadsheets. You can’t cut your way to innovation.
Junior staff aren’t the problem – but they are being set up to fail. If we want to rebuild, we must restore balance and support the next generation properly.
Ironically, the next wave of great titles may come not from major studios but from veterans who launch successful independent IPs with sustainable models. Instead of speculative growth, these creators may focus on innovation and craft, winning fan loyalty and commercial success on their own terms.
But if studios continue on their current path – recycling franchises, ignoring local IPs, and squeezing teams until they collapse – the question isn’t what games they’ll release next. It’s whether they’ll survive long enough to release anything at all.

Aleksey Savchenko is a veteran game developer, futurist, author, and BAFTA member with nearly three decades’ experience in the tech and entertainment industries. Currently the Director of R&D, Technology and External Resources at GSC Game World, he has worked on the studio’s acclaimed S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 and with Epic Games on expanding Unreal Engine in Eastern Europe. He is the author of Game as Business and the Cyberside series of cyberpunk graphic novels. Cyberside: Level Zero is out now.
Main image: Courtesy Kevin Ku/Pexels
TOP STORIES
-
Could this be the future of cheap flying? World’s largest electric aircraft uses just $5 of power -
Banks face calls for ban on ‘dangerous’ AI -
No eclipse glasses? How to watch tonight’s spectacle without risking your sight -
EXPO REAL adds infrastructure as property investors seek safer long-term returns -
ESA creates artificial eclipses to predict tomorrow’s real one -
Firms with political pals ‘get away with greenwashing’ -
NVIDIA teams up with Wall Street giants in $500bn push to fund AI boom -
UK government urged to act as Afghanistan marks five years under Taliban rule -
Brits flee the heat as wildfires force holiday rethink -
AI ‘kill switch’ launched to stop rogue agents in seconds -
Young Britons drive UK screen 'set-jetting' tourism boom -
Passenger jet flies on fuel made from waste CO₂ in aviation breakthrough -
Chinese education group to buy Dublin Business School for US$127.5m -
Germany could run on full renewables by 2045, study reveals -
Marriott signs all-inclusive resort deals in Jamaica and Zanzibar -
AI takes majority of European venture funding as money floods into few firms -
Rewilding improves wellbeing and community connection, charity report says -
RABAM raises $500,000 ahead of Series A round -
Prologis agrees £14.3bn takeover of UK warehouse group Segro -
Germany’s former coal heartland makes pitch as Europe’s next AI hub -
Iran war shock hits Eurozone spending twice as hard as expected -
Spain urges EU rules as Chinese factories move in -
Shell earnings more than double as Middle East conflict lifts energy prices -
Deutsche Bank profits rise as trading business booms -
Europe’s worst wildfires in modern times could cost billions
Why modern computer games aren’t a patch on the classics
Aleksey Savchenko
- Published
- Opinion & Analysis, Technology

TOP STORIES
-
The World Cup that changed Europe’s view of the U.S -
Is Mars humanity’s greatest adventure or a one-way trip? -
Why the UK’s reset with Europe could and must involve environmental co-operation -
Why Britain needs a National Resilience Service -
Toxic masculinity, like climate change, can only be denied until the flames burn down your house -
Risk is the necessary price of progress -
How neurodivergent professionals can overcome justice sensitivity at work -
What the London riots can teach entrepreneurs about resilience -
Europe’s wild-swimming boom is outpacing water safety -
Could YOU spot a deepfake influencer? -
The dangerous precedent behind the Shabir Ahmed deportation row -
Why medical research struggles to explain chronic disease -
Memorial quilts honouring lives lost to suicide tour the UK -
How Cyprus is surviving Europe’s growing water crisis -
What ‘passport bros’ misunderstand about Thai women -
Andy Burnham must learn Mark Carney’s hardest lesson -
What Yellowstone’s wolves could teach us about our pets’ health -
How I would close the sociology gap inside AI companies -
Why Europe’s rush to rearm cannot end the fear of nuclear war -
Military chaplains must not be left behind in the age of autonomous weapons -
Minority women are more visible in the creative industries but still underrepresented in ownership -
I was inside the Millennium Dome when the £200M diamond raiders struck -
Why AI Companies need a resident sociologist -
Andy Burnham becomes Prime Minister in five days – now he must deliver for disabled people -
Bosses: stop writing off talent over exam results





















































