Half of counteroffers successful as hiring crisis continues
John E. Kaye

- Three in 10 (31%) of those searching for a new role would consider a counteroffer from their current employer
- More than half (53%) of those who have received a counteroffer in the past accepted
- However, a third (34%) who accepted had moved on from their organisation within six months, suggesting counteroffers are only a short-term fix
With close to 1.3 million job vacancies across the UK, and 9.4 million employees looking to make a career move before July, new research reveals that employers worried about retention may be able to buy time with a counteroffer.
According to the latest study from talent solutions consultancy Robert Half, 31 per cent of those currently looking for a new role would consider a counteroffer from their current employer – but they are serious about leaving if the offer is not right.
While movement in the job market is above and beyond pre-pandemic levels, not everyone currently applying for and interviewing for roles is serious about making a move. Nearly one in five (19%) of those looking for a new role are hoping that their employer will make them a counteroffer.
More than two in five people (42%) who are currently searching for a new role would like a pay rise, while 19 per cent would like a promotion, so it is no surprise that in an active job market where demand is outpacing supply that one in five (18%) have seen an opportunity to use a job offer as a bargaining chip – and it works.
Counteroffers are commonplace (although not guaranteed), with 57 per cent having received one at some point in their career – but it does appear to be a more effective strategy for men than women. While slightly more women than men are willing to consider a counteroffer, they are less likely to receive one. Three in five (61%) of men have received a counteroffer in their lifetime, in comparison to only half of women (52%).
For employers, making a counteroffer is an effective retention strategy, as more than half (53%) of those who received one the last time they were offered a new role elsewhere accepted it. However, it will not encourage employees to remain with an organisation long-term, without other actions on the part of the employer.
One third (34%) of those who accepted a counteroffer from an employer had left the organisation within six months, and three-quarters (74%) had left within a year. Employees aged under 35 will move on more quickly, with nearly half (47%) leaving within six months of accepting a counteroffer.
Matt Weston, Senior District Director for the UK, Ireland, UAE and BeNeLux, said: “Counteroffers are often only a temporary fix, and business leaders should prepare for their employees to leave within six months regardless. However, it can help employers to buy time and plan for how they may plug the gap further down the road, especially given the level of demand in the market, which makes the hiring process longer and more expensive.
“To prevent employees from seeking new roles in the first place, or to encourage them to stay after they accept a counteroffer, employers need to focus on their retention strategies. While salaries, benefits and flexible working are important parts of the puzzle, understanding employees’ mindsets is crucial. Appealing to their motivations or addressing their concerns is one thing that can really make a difference.”
Previous research from Robert Half revealed that salary was still the most important consideration for jobseekers, followed by flexible working, commute time and values, suggesting that employers should focus on these areas to retain their best talent.
TOP STORIES
-
Putin 'plotting to break NATO without firing a shot', Latvian military analyst warns -
British AI chip startup hits £5bn valuation as government backs bid to challenge global tech giants -
World's biggest military airshow moves to ‘Britain’s Area 51’ after Iran war disruption at RAF Fairford -
Lisa Nandy threatens crackdown on entertainment industry after David Walliams allegations -
UK and European experts demand tougher AI laws as Australia considers criminal penalties after OpenAI breach -
BBC loses bid to throw out Trump's $10bn defamation lawsuit over doctored Panorama speech -
AI-generated CVs spark hiring crisis as a third of employers lose confidence in job applicants -
MPs back calls for ‘Black English’ and ‘Asian English’ options on census -
Nvidia hires top US lawyer to investigate CEO's alleged affair with Chinese spy -
EXCLUSIVE – Comic Relief confirms David Walliams is no longer an honorary trustee and has ‘no formal association’ with charity -
Why Airbnb and Uber take off in some cities but flop in others, according to scientists -
Michael Jackson's Thriller jacket, Princess Diana's dresses and $3m Banksy painting go under the hammer -
European entrepreneurs trust AI firms more than governments as four-in-10 look beyond Europe -
Krakow massacre gunman named after hospital death as police officer fights for life -
British Airways owner warns green fuel rules could ‘kill European aviation’ -
EU to join Ukraine–Russia peace talks as von der Leyen warns of escalating Black Sea attacks -
Scientists grow world's largest diamond crystal in breakthrough that could stop AI chips overheating -
China takes on Rolls-Royce with floating £230,000 electric limousine -
Infront hires Deutsche Börse data expert Jeff Caldwell as AI transforms financial markets -
US rocket firm plans Scottish launches in bid to revive failed Highland spaceport -
Job adverts must reveal salaries under new ‘say what you pay’ law -
Ireland's most wanted jobs for 2027 revealed as employers offer higher salaries to attract talent -
American firms sign landmark deal to beam solar power from space as Europe faces AI energy crunch -
Europe’s winners and losers as Democrats seize Congress in crushing blow to Trump -
Spanish developer CLERHP reports US$410m in Caribbean property sales as profits return




























