The grid that will decide Europe’s future

Caspar Herzberg
- Published
- Opinion & Analysis

AI, electrification, and heavy industry all depend on one thing: power that works when and where it’s needed. Here, Caspar Herzberg of AVEVA warns that unless Europe redefines how it measures success, its grids — and its economy — will fail the next industrial test
“The first rule is that a measurement – any measurement – is better than none. But a genuinely effective indicator will cover the output of the work unit and not simply the activity involved.”
So wrote Intel’s legendary former CEO Andy Grove in his 1983 classic High Output Management.
And so it is with the state of European electrical grids. We need a fundamental rethinking of the key performance indicators that guide our grid infrastructure, concentrating on results, rather than inputs. As Grove well understood, measuring the outcomes that matter is no mere technocratic concern, but is rather a precondition for improving productivity and competitiveness.
Let’s address the electrical pylon in the room: European energy costs are not globally competitive. In its Electricity 2025 report, the International Energy Agency (IEA) finds European industrial firms pay more than twice the prices for electricity enjoyed by their American peers, and 50% more than their Chinese counterparts.
Speaking of China, the World Economic Forum’s latest Energy Transition Index notes that the Chinese economy accounted for roughly 40% of all clean energy investments in 2024. Regulators there are prioritising grid enhancements to support these new resources in a bid to cement China’s status as the world’s first “electrostate,” not just in terms of competitiveness, but also with an eye to energy security.
As we look ahead to COP30, grids also loom large as a major climate stumbling block and may tell the tale of whether Europe’s net-zero targets are met. Modelling by the IEA suggests grid connection delays, for example, could result in incremental carbon emissions through 2050 equivalent to those of the total power sector over a four-year span.
The recent announcement by Dan Jørgensen, EU Commissioner for Energy and Housing, of Europe’s first two “tripartite” contracts, for offshore wind and energy storage, are a step in the right direction. A central plank of the EU’s Affordable Energy Action Plan, published in February 2025, these contracts bring together the public sector, power producers and industry to address energy affordability and reliability and promote a favourable investment climate for clean energy.
Procurement and construction-focused yardsticks for grids are not enough. We need to go beyond crude, quasi-theoretical measures of capacity like gigawatts awarded or installed to a basket of performance-based metrics that reflect the real-world context of industrial power use. What industry truly lacks is confidence that power is not just available but is affordable and reliable where it’s needed.
“Strategic” industrial loads, the electricity required for large-scale energy-consuming processes (e.g., smelting of metals, clinker production in cement), represent some of the biggest strains on grids. However, they can be strategically shifted based on grid conditions, but only if there is enough intelligence in the system. Therein lies the opportunity and the challenge, especially in an evolving energy landscape where intermittent renewable sources account for the lion’s share of generation.
Of course, the big industrial electricity demand ahead is AI data centres. According to a recent report from Ember, a global energy think tank, electricity requirements from data centres in Europe will increase 150% in the next decade. That same report notes that it can take up to 13 years to connect a data centre to the grid.
That’s a sobering metric. If Europe wants an electrified, fossil fuel-independent industry and an AI and high-performance computing sector that can go toe to toe with technology competitors anywhere on the planet, the grid must be planned and managed with operational and economic realities in mind.
In response, regulators are increasingly looking to system-level measures of network performance. In joint principles on smart grid performance indicators published last year, the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER) called for more emphasis on efficiency, resilience and affordability.
The 2019 EU Electricity Directive mandates the development of smart grid indicators and performance monitoring. In May of this year, the European Parliament adopted a report identifying electrification rate, curtailments, grid congestion costs, cross-border interconnectivity and penetration rates of digital systems as some of the relevant barometers.
Digital capabilities are especially critical. With greater intelligence and situational awareness, we can make better predictions about grid operations, optimising power flows, load balancing and maintenance.
We can tap into dynamic line ratings (DLRs), which use real-time data about ambient temperatures, wind speeds and solar radiation levels to forecast more precisely the amount of energy that can safely flow through transmission lines without causing an outage. This means we can dramatically increase the utilisation of existing infrastructure and integrate renewables more seamlessly in the overall power mix.
More sophisticated measures of grid performance will benefit transmission and distribution system operators, policymakers, providers of capital and industry itself in making better decisions about designing, building and operating the continent’s energy system.
The European Court of Auditors’ Review in January put the price tag of grid infrastructure upgrades needed to meet Europe’s net-zero aims at a staggering €1.994 to €2.294 trillion through 2050.
That’s a tall order. The choice between patching antiquated grid hardware and the “Waiting for Godot” scenario of an end-to-end overhaul of infrastructure is a false one, however. When it comes to grids, brains win over brawn.
The grid of the future will be software defined. By harnessing time-series data about grid operations, digital twins for real-time simulation and AI-powered predictive analytics at scale, we can make optimal use of existing capacity in the short term while infrastructure buildouts and connection queues are addressed over time.
But Europe’s smart grid of tomorrow will depend on good data. That begins with having the right measures of success in mind today.

Caspar Herzberg is chief executive officer of industrial software leader AVEVA and is a member of the Executive Committee of Schneider Electric. He is based in London.
READ MORE: ‘Why hybrid energy systems are set to power the continent‘. When industry leaders, tech visionaries, and green-energy pioneers converge on Munich this May for Intersolar Europe, they’ll be talking about a concept that’s finally having its moment in the spotlight: hybrid power plants. It might not sound glamorous, but combining the power of sun, wind, and water with advanced battery technology is quietly changing the way we think about energy, writes John E. Kaye.
Do you have news to share or expertise to contribute? The European welcomes insights from business leaders and sector specialists. Get in touch with our editorial team to find out more.
Main image: Upgrading grid performance, not just capacity, has become central to the continent’s economic and climate strategy.
Sign up to The European Newsletter
RECENT ARTICLES
-
Why Gen Z struggles with pressure — and what their bosses must do about it
-
What Indian philosophy can teach modern business about resilient systems
-
AI can’t swim — but it might save those who do
-
The age of unreason in American politics
-
Digitalization, financial inclusion, and a new era of banking services: Uzbekistan’s road to WTO membership
-
Meet Omar Yaghi, the Nobel Prize chemist turning air into water
-
Behind the non-food retail CX Benchmark: what the numbers tell us about Europe’s future
-
Why NHS cancer care still fails disabled people
-
Echoes of 1936 in a restless and divided Britain
-
Middle management still holds the power leaders need
-
Trump and painkillers: The attack on science is an attack on democracy
-
The end of corporate devotion? What businesses can learn from Gen Z
-
Britain’s free speech crisis: the weaponisation of complaints and the erosion of police discretion
-
The fight for independence disabled people shouldn’t have to wage
-
No ramp, no chance: how inaccessible workplaces crush disabled talent
-
Work-life balance is a myth — this is what great leaders do instead
-
I never expected the Spanish Inquisition. How bureaucracy turned my life into a Python sketch
-
Drowning is a public health crisis. Governments must treat it that way
-
Britain’s most exclusive car show returns to Hampton Court
-
The Tokyo war crimes trial: an explainer 77 years on
-
Europe’s semiconductor boom 'risks stalling without skilled talent'
-
The night sky in September – equinox stars and hidden constellations
-
Project 2025: America’s gravest constitutional stress test since the Civil War
-
The trillion-pound question: why Bitcoin just became too big for boardrooms to ignore
-
Diving into… open water safely